(At the same time, there are people who don't want software at all, and even oppose the option-it's not easy to reflect all these sentiments in a single conclusive verdict.) As for the software, it's something that can be done, and I've suggested to Zephyr that this would be a very welcome addition. However, for those that do want a fan in their mouse, the Zephyr is not only a very good choice but the only one, and hence worthy of a recommendation. Indeed there are plenty of other mice with similar or better features and similar or better performance for $50 or less, so paying the premium for the Zephyr no doubt isn't worth it in that case. but I guess we'll have to wait to see if theres any software to begin with on this Zephyr.?Ĭlick to expand.If the fan doesn't appeal to you then I can absolutely understand why you'd find the 'Recommended' unwarranted. with the alternative mouse probably providing a more mature software suit to entertain. That being said, I'll stick to my original notion that this "recommended" badge was awarded without any real merit to a mouse that could be beaten in features (thats what we pay for on a mouse, after all, not fan size or CFM) for a substantially lower cost. its about providing your target audience with solid, actionable advice that saves them money or from using a sub-par product. but being a reviewer isnt about reviewing things for your own pleasure or even judging the item based on your own ideals as an end-user. I see some sense in what you've just said but I cannot look past the "recommended" on what you yourself have confirmed as being a pre-production example that does not represent either a finished product or a high standard of QC.Īlso, I'd like to say this with the utmost respect for you and everyone else out there that does this for a living or just a passion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |